How We Snack with Information & What To Do About It

nutellasnack

My previous posts on choices and raising the bar have resulted in a lot of interesting discussions with readers. It’s gotten me thinking about many disturbing trends that are happening. The biggest set of trends relate to snacking.

Our society has become addicted to snacking:

.
  • We snack with information.
  • We snack with food.
  • We snack with our interactions with others.
  • We snack with our work.

.

By snacking here, I’m referring to us just getting a taste of something. Typically this taste – or snack – is just enough for us to feel like we’ve done “something” but that something is rarely enough.

Over the next 4 days, I’ll be running through each of the 4 ways we snack. I hope by the end of this series, you’ll become more aware of your own snacking patterns and perhaps make changes in areas where it is warranted.

.

We Snack with Information

.

How we do this

.

We skim and get the general idea of information rather than absorbing and understanding it.

.

An example of how we snack with information

.

Let’s say you see a tweet on Twitter that says, “Facebook demographics changing – largest growth in 35-50 age group,” along with a link.

The serious snacker would see that tweet and file the summary per the subject away in their head for the short-term.

The middle-of-the-road snacker would click on the link, skim the article and probably not end up with any bigger of a takeaway than what they learned from the title itself.

.

Why do we snack with information

.

We’re becoming avid surface absorbers of trivial information.  I think many of us feel that knowing all these bits of information must do something for us.

I’ve also noticed that people tend to be more interested in information that somehow backs up who they are and their own opinions even if it adds no real value to them to possess this knowledge.

I hazard a guess that if the above tweet and information were real, the people most likely to retweet (share) the information with others would be:

.
  • Those that work in social media (relevant to their occupation)
  • Those that use Facebook (since it is related to something they personally use)
  • Those that fall into the 35-50 age group (since they belong to that age group)
.

When snacking with information becomes a problem

.

There are 4 times when snacking with information becomes a problem:

.
  1. When we snack on too much information that has no relevance to us.
  2. When we snack on so much information, our ability to filter out what is important – what we should know and be absorbing – becomes diminished.
  3. When we pass along information snackage to others.
  4. When we actually do come across information that is relevant to us and we choose to snack rather than to absorb and understand.
.

It is a really vicious cycle for many people: we don’t filter the information we take in to determine what is important or isn’t, we scan rather than read those things that could impact us, we don’t spend a lot of time thinking about what we discover, we don’t take action on what we learn and then we feel the need to share this snackage with others.

.

What should we be doing?

.

I agree that snacking on some kinds of information is a good thing for some people. Information has become entertainment as well. I don’t think that we need to get rid of information snacking entirely.

But I do think many people need to start actively applying filters to information. Filters so that we can more easily recognize when we come across information that is relevant and/or can improve our lives and our businesses.

Let me share an example of this from this site:

One  of the posts on this site is about how to target Gmail in Google Adwords. This post contained information being sold by others. It is solid content. For those of you that have a business, being able to get highly responsive web site visitors for low acquisition costs should be a priority.  It really should be a no brainer to try it – especially if you are already using Google Adwords for advertising.

The post was one of the lowest read and recirculated ones at this site. I’m not really surprised about that because it is geared to a more limited audience than many of the other posts.

I decided to conduct a little survey. I went to people I knew who visit this blog (primarily those who have tweeted posts or who are subscribers) and asked if they had read the post until I got to 10.

I asked those 10 people if they could answer 3 questions:

.
  1. Do they use Google Adwords? 6 of 10 said they do now and 2 said they have.
  2. Do they need more business? All said yes.
  3. Have they tried the Gmail targeting I described before or since reading the post? All said no.
.

Note: This isn’t to point fingers at any one individual or group of individuals. It’s simple to illustrate how our filtering can often mean we miss out on things that can provide value.

I’m not suggesting that the post described the Holy Grail of marketing. But what I am suggesting that all of this information snacking we do in the end will do very little for us if we don’t start to:

.
  1. Filter out those things relevant to us,
  2. Understand, rather than surface absorb information and
  3. Take action.
.

What do you think? Do you believe information snacking is a problem? Do you do it?

.

Photograph by Incase Designs


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • FriendFeed
  • MySpace
  • Posterous
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • BlinkList
  • Fark
  • Identi.ca
  • Slashdot
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • You seem to see this as a new behaviour, but it's been there for a long time. A lot of people read only the headline or skimmed succintly a newspaper article way before the Internet. Same was true with magazines. Nothing new.

    The fact that blogs are followed and read by people interested in your field (compared with newspaper, where people are not necessarily in what you write) does not change the age old rules of redaction: catch the attention of your reader and make sure they'll read to the end.

    In the article you mention, it might have been a good idea to give your readers a heads up on what was your content, either by using a small TOC, or simply by telling it in a presentation paragraph.

    I think the "snack" result is not due to some kind of generational ADD, but rather to a surge of new writers who never took the time to actually learn the art of copywriting.
  • sharonhayes
    Thanks for your comment.

    No, I didn't say that this was a new behavior. What I was saying is that information snacking is growing, that entrepreneurs need to be aware of this and be able to better filter information so they can recognize what they can take action on to improve their business.
  • Hi Sharon,

    I think that we are living in a world with a serious information overload problem, there is too much stuff taking our attention, we do snack information, imho Twitter is a big responsible for this snacking, there are people tweeting hundreds of articles daily, and for much that they say that they are fast readers, they are lying, they don´t read, they scan or snack.

    You do have a point here, we need to choose carefully the info that we want to consume, take rss feeds for example, they are great, but also are a serious case of info overload, there is no point to subscribe to hundreds of feeds, at the end of the day you will have to "mark all as read".

    Anyway, for the record,i do read all the YOAL posts ;-), guess that the donate button in that gmail article didn´t work out, right?

    See you.
  • sharonhayes
    Hi Pedro! (Wow, my 2 Pedro friends commented back to back here! Great!)

    I actually do read everything I tweet. Which is why on days you see me not tweeting much content, it is because I don't have the time to go through things like normal. :) But I do wonder if a lot of other volume Twitter users actually read what they tweet (vs scan).

    LOL The donate button was a joke because of the "guru" selling the info for $97. It was directed at one person and I removed it once they had their laugh :)
  • I Agree That Information Snacking Is Indeed A Concern. From A Knowledge Management Perspective, One Could Hypothesize That This 21st Century Phenomenon Is A By-Product Of The Pace Of Modern Life.

    The abundance of information at our fingertips, and in fact the often overwhelming deluge and immediacy of the information age may in fact be driving us to develop "short attention spans" as a coping mechanism. I always try to counsel to others that there is nothing wrong with "casual knowledge ingestion" - in fact, having a high level awareness and understanding across a broad number of domains and subject areas is a very valuable asset. What is critical however, is being aware and filtering for those items that merit a more "serious study", and having a mechanism of flagging, stack ranking and following up on these.

    An obvious manifestation of people "lacking time for reflection and dialogue" is evident in the blogosphere, where many very good articles and insightful perspectives lie with nary a comment to be found.

    It's like going to a great restaurant, with the sole purpose in mind of nourishing your body with the required caloric intake to take you through the next leg of the day, only ordering from the appetizer menu and getting out of there in 30 minutes. You need to know when its important to stay a bit longer, order that specialty from the main menu, pour that glass of wine and engage in an "experience" that will stay with you long after the calories ingested have been burned away...

    Ok, I know - that analogy is a stretch. I'm of European descent...I enjoy my food and find wine. There, I came clean!

    Great article and as per norm, a very engaging writing style. If all I consumed were as eloquent and well structured in both form & function!

    Best Regards - Pedro
  • sharonhayes
    Absolutely Pedro! I especially agree with this:

    "What is critical however, is being aware and filtering for those items that merit a more "serious study", and having a mechanism of flagging, stack ranking and following up on these."

    I think I've gotten myself to the point where I now do this without thinking - it just automatically happens.

    "An obvious manifestation of people "lacking time for reflection and dialogue" is evident in the blogosphere, where many very good articles and insightful perspectives lie with nary a comment to be found."

    Yup.... I think part of this is that many people WOULD like to comment but they don't want to be the first or they feel if others haven't commented, there isn't much point in doing so themselves.
  • suze
    where i get in trouble is not delving deeper. i read the tweet or whatever drew attn; i click on link and read. i often follow other links in the article - used to get lost now have a 'system' to avoid this. there needs to be real information corroborated by others, links to studies, comments by other readers, you know, you follow the info trail. always learn something... i don't like marketing per se; sales vocation always seemed self-serving at the cost of honesty; not everyone likes to research or investigate but i think it's a skill everyone must develop if species is to advance - imagine being swayed by a sweet smile forever.
  • sharonhayes
    Thanks for your comment Suze! I understand what you mean. I used to be like that myself. I'd read something and then follow all of the related/referenced links on something and end up going on tangents and find a lot of time had passed. Last year, I shifted in the other direction where I snacked way too much and started to run into filtering issues. This changed when I got to the point of being aware of what I was doing and have since started to make changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus